Short research notes on the recurring decisions institutional limited partners actually face — written for investment committees, not for the conference circuit.
A named research column from PrivateMetrics. Each entry takes one recurring LP decision — hold-or-sell, what attribution actually measures, when private equity is prudent in a retirement plan, what fiduciary-defensible GP research looks like — and works it through with the discipline an allocator already lives with. Short by design; the full papers sit behind them.
A point forecast of a private-market cash flow is not identifiable from the available data — careful analysts reach materially different answers, and the data don't adjudicate. A more honest frame evaluates the decision across the full range of beliefs an LP could reasonably hold, and surfaces when the choice is genuinely close.
The 401(k) rule is the news; the discipline underneath it is the point — and it is not unique to defined-contribution plans. A process-based safe harbor only protects the fiduciary who can actually run the process.
Before asking how to attribute private-markets performance, ask what the attribution is of. An LP commitment fixes a strategy, a geography, a vintage, a manager, a size, and a pacing position all at once — and an attribution is only meaningful along the dimensions the process actually decided on.
Pacing is not a scheduling detail — it is a first-order policy choice on a profit–liquidity frontier, with a material, compounding cost of getting it wrong that an IRR comparison cannot see.
Commit exactly at target and you underinvest by design. A look at the four commitment policies LPs actually use — and the one that wins without needing any forecast at all.
The ILPA Performance Template lets LPs recompute performance under their own assumptions. Once you can compute anything, the discipline is matching each metric to the question — and knowing what each one cannot see.
Why GP research is process evidence, what fiduciary-grade source taxonomy actually requires, and how to evaluate whether an AI-augmented research platform meets the standard a regulator or plaintiff's counsel will apply two years after the decision is made.
Short research notes for LPs — one recurring fund-portfolio decision at a time. Occasional emails, no fixed schedule, unsubscribe anytime.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your inbox.